top of page
Search

What We Bring to the Table

Aug 29
6 min read

Updated: Sep 2


I have always believed that one of the best ways to understand a place is through the food people eat there. Not simply by finding the “best restaurant” or checking another experience off a travel list, but by sitting down, paying attention, and becoming curious enough to ask a few questions.

What grows here, and perhaps more importantly, what does not? What did people eat before highways, grocery stores, and global supply chains made almost anything available almost anywhere? Why has this particular dish survived, and what does it tell us about the people who created it? I have found myself thinking about these questions while traveling through places where the landscape itself seems to explain so much about the people who live there.

Remote mountain villages, thin air, long distances, harsh winters, and land that can be both brutal and glorious have shaped the people who have learned to make a life there. In some places, villages are sparsely populated and difficult to reach, while the landscape feels vast, peaceful, and almost untouched by the pace of modern life. Then you sit down to eat, and suddenly the food begins telling another part of the story.

A hearty dish takes on new meaning when you understand the climate and the demands of daily life. Scarcity on the plate begins to make sense when you consider the geography and the difficulty of transporting food into remote areas.

Preserving food becomes more than a culinary tradition when you understand what was necessary for people to survive through changing seasons. Even recipes passed down through generations begin to feel like something more than instructions for preparing a meal. They carry history, adaptation, resilience, creativity, and the accumulated knowledge of people who learned how to live in a particular place.

Food, in that sense, is never just food. It offers one of the most tangible ways to understand the relationship between the land, the people, and the identity they create together. Perhaps that is why certain meals stay with us long after we have returned home. Sometimes it isn't because the food was particularly fancy or because the restaurant was famous, but because the experience allowed us to understand something we could not have understood otherwise.

You realize that what is on your plate has been shaped over time by geography, scarcity, migration, tradition, and the people who came before. Yet culture is never completely fixed or preserved in one perfect moment.

People move, new influences arrive, ingredients become available, recipes evolve, and languages borrow words and ideas from one another. We move forward while still carrying pieces of where we have been.

I see an interesting version of this happening close to home in Arizona, where there has been a growing effort to bring local and Indigenous foods into the college community and give people a chance to experience flavors they might not otherwise encounter.

Some of these foods are not particularly “in your face.” They don't necessarily announce themselves as cultural lessons. Instead, they quietly introduce you to a place and its history through something as ordinary and wonderful as food.

One example is Wojapi, a traditional Indigenous berry sauce made by slowly cooking berries until they become thick, concentrated, tart, and naturally sweet. Depending on the region and what is available, the berries might include chokecherries, blueberries, or blackberries.

What I find especially interesting is what happens when an old food tradition meets something completely familiar. Imagine taking a flaky North American biscuit and sweetening it not with refined sugar, but with wojapi. A thick, cooled berry reduction can be folded into the biscuit dough, creating layers of buttery pastry with ribbons of concentrated berry flavor running through them.

As the biscuits bake, the wojapi becomes part of the experience rather than simply something served alongside it, creating little pockets of tart sweetness and a completely different interpretation of something many of us already recognize.

To me, that is where food becomes particularly interesting. The tradition hasn't disappeared simply because the form has changed. Instead, something from the past is being carried forward, introduced to someone new, and given another opportunity to tell its story. Our identities can change, fluctuate, and expand while certain roots and values remain remarkably strong. Food can do the same thing.

I recently heard the story of a family who made the decision to leave Rome and move to the countryside, and what struck me most was their reason for doing it. They weren't leaving because they disliked convenience, hated city life, or wanted to romanticize a more difficult existence.

Instead, they were choosing something harder because they wanted to connect more deeply with their roots and the landscape around them. They wanted to discover what would happen when life became less convenient and demanded more perseverance, creativity, and resilience.

More than anything, they were curious about what they might learn about themselves by moving through difficulty rather than constantly trying to avoid it. That idea has stayed with me because it feels somewhat counterintuitive in a world increasingly designed to make everything easier.

We have more information, more convenience, and more technology available to us than perhaps any generation before us. Yet I sometimes wonder what happens when removing every possible obstacle becomes one of our primary goals. What might we lose when we no longer have to struggle with something? How does our ability to persevere change when difficulty is automatically viewed as something to eliminate rather than something we might occasionally choose?

Of course, there are plenty of difficulties in life that none of us would choose. Yet there may also be something valuable about deliberately taking on challenges that require us to stretch, adapt, and discover what we are capable of doing.

As a language teacher, I think about this often. We are now living in a time when someone can reasonably ask why they should learn another language when AI can translate almost anything for them. And AI can do some remarkable things.

It can translate words, help us communicate, provide information almost instantly, and make travel considerably easier. It can help us navigate a country, read a menu, understand a sign, or figure out how to ask a question. But I don't think that was ever the real point of learning another language.

Learning a language is not simply about getting the words right or finding the fastest and most efficient way to communicate. At its heart, language learning asks us to connect, to remain curious, and to step outside of ourselves and toward another person. Along the way, we expand our capacity to understand and, perhaps equally important, our capacity to be understood.

Trying to speak another language, especially when we aren't very good at it yet, requires a willingness to be uncomfortable. We have to tolerate making mistakes, searching for words, misunderstanding something, and trying again even when it would be much easier to let someone or something else do the work for us.

Perhaps that difficulty is not simply an unfortunate part of the process. Maybe it is part of what gives the process its value. We become students again, and studentship can take many forms throughout our lives.

For one person, it might mean sitting in a classroom and learning something completely unfamiliar. For another, it might mean trying to have a conversation when the words don't come easily. It might also mean sitting at a table in a place you have never been, tasting something unfamiliar, and realizing how much more there is to learn. At other times, studentship may involve intentionally choosing a path that is less convenient because we want to discover whether we can persevere through something difficult.

Technology can give us answers, but answers are not necessarily the same thing as understanding. Information cannot replace experience, and translation is not the same thing as connection. AI may make many things easier for us, and there is certainly value in that. Still, I don't want “easier” to become the only measure by which we decide what is worth doing.

Struggling to understand another person and continuing to try anyway feels deeply human to me. So does learning a few words in another person's language, asking about the food on the table, and listening to the story behind it.

Perhaps the border you came from matters less than what you bring to the table. What do you bring with you when you encounter another person, another culture, or another way of living? Do you arrive with curiosity and a willingness to listen? Are you willing to learn when learning requires more effort than simply looking for an immediate answer?

Not simply collecting information or having immediate access to every answer. But remaining open to what we don't yet know and continuing to move toward it. Sometimes that means sitting down at the table, asking a question, and staying curious long enough to listen to the answer. And sometimes, it means choosing not to take the easiest path simply because it is available.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page